The prevalence of ADSL (rs3788579) and CYP1A2 (rs17861162) polymorphisms in female breast cancer patients in North-West Iran

Introduction Breast cancer is a prevalent and significant contributor to cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Its increasing incidence, especially in regions like North-West Iran, necessitates a deeper understanding of genetic factors contributing to its development. Genetic alterations, particularly single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), are implicated in breast cancer susceptibility, making investigation in this context crucial. This study explores the role of CYP1A2-rs17861162 and ADSL-rs3788579 SNPs in breast cancer risk among Iranian women. Methods This study involved 200 female breast cancer patients and 200 healthy controls in North-West Iran. DNA was extracted from blood samples, and PCR–RFLP was used for genotyping the CYP1A2 and ADSL genes. Results The CYP1A2-rs17861162 SNP exhibited a shift from the C allele to the G allele in breast cancer patients, resulting in a 21.7% decrease in CC genotype frequency and a 21.6% and 77.8% increase in CG and GG genotypes, respectively, compared to controls. In ADSL-rs3788579 SNP, breast cancer patients had a significantly higher prevalence of the T allele, with a 28.5% increase compared to controls. In healthy participants, CC was most common, while in the breast cancer group, TT was most common. Conclusion This study highlights significant genetic alterations in CYP1A2-rs17861162 and ADSL-rs3788579 SNPs among breast cancer patients in North-West Iran, suggesting their potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Further research is warranted to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying their contributions to breast cancer susceptibility in this population.


Introduction
Breast cancer is now the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, constituting approximately 24.5% of all cancer cases [1,2].t also accounts for 15.5% of cancer-related deaths, making it a significant contributor to cancerrelated mortality in women.This is largely due to the complexity of the disease, including its various manifestations, capacity to spread, and resistance to treatment [1,3,4].Despite extensive research efforts spanning several decades encompassing laboratory work, epidemiological studies, and clinical investigations, the incidence of breast cancer has continued to rise for most of the past forty years.In the recent decade (2010-2019), there was an annual increase in the incidence rate of 0.5% [5,6].Recent studies report an increase in incidence in the Asian continent, including Iran [7].Currently, breast cancer is the most common neoplastic disease among Iranian women, with an age of onset 10 years below the global average [8,9].
Breast cancer is a considerably heterogeneous disease with numerous genetic and environmental risk factors [10].Genetic alterations (mutations or omissions) to the DNA structure may result in significant cellular damage or cancerous changes [11].Approximately 5-10% of all instances of breast cancer arise from familial and hereditary causes [12].Studies also report an increased risk for developing breast cancer in individuals with a genetic predisposition who are also exposed to environmental risk factors [13].As the most frequently occurring genomic alterations, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are responsible for the majority of genomic diversity and subsequent interpersonal phenotypic variation [14,15].Furthermore, SNPs also act as predisposing genetic factors, contributing to the development and progression of cancers [14], including breast cancer [16].
Cytochrome (CY) enzyme family is a mega-family consisting of more than a hundred proteins all containing a heme group and overall structural resemblance.Cytochromes can be found in a wide range of living organisms, albeit with minor differences [17].Cytochrome P450 proteins refer to a superfamily of complex monooxygenases that catalyze various substrates (e.g.xenobiotics, estrogen, testosterone, cholesterol, vitamin D, steroids, fatty acids, bile acids, and numerous exogenous compounds, including drugs and toxins) [18].CYP1 is a prominent member of P450s, comprising an extensive genomic group responsible for mitigating the biological effects of various chemical compounds.CYP1 itself is comprised of three sub-groups: A, B, and C, with CYP1A comprising three members (CYP1A1 through 3) [19].
CYP1A2 corresponds to the metabolic enzymes active in phase I reactions of cytochrome P450 and is responsible for the expression of 15% of P450 proteins.Although it was previously believed that CYP1A2 is exclusively produced by the liver [20], recent studies have also identified the breasts as a secondary production site [21].CYP1A2 is located on chromosome 15, with a size of 7.8 kb and comprising 7 expressional and one non-coding exon [22].This enzyme is directly involved in the metabolism and neutralization of 10-13% of all medications and carcinogens [22,23].The expression and activity of CYP1A2 are heavily influenced by genetic polymorphism [10,24].Several studies report an association between CYP1A2 and lung and bladder cancers, while its relationship with breast cancer in different ethnicities needs further investigation [25].To date, researchers have identified 150 variant alleles for this gene, of which 26-30 are considered nonsynonymous polymorphisms with a frequency of less than 1% [22,23].
ADSL also plays a prominent role in the structure of DNAs and RNAs, metabolism, cell survival, and proliferation [29,30].The importance of purine biosynthesis pathway enzymes first came to notice after studies on severe mental retardation, autistic traits, and conditions such as Down syndrome and sensorineural deafness [26].In cancer cells, a significant imbalance can be seen between the purine metabolism enzymatic pattern and cellular alteration and cancer progression [31].Several investigations have reported reduced adenylosuccinate lyase levels in various neoplasias, such as transplanted tumors, transformed cell lines, and human tumors [32].The ADSL encoding gene is located on chromosome 22q13.1 → q13.2, and defects in its corresponding enzyme are considered genetically

Materials and method
The current study consists of two separate investigations carried out during the spring and summer of 2020.It was conducted as part of a collaboration between Urmia and Bonab Islamic Azad University, Omid Hospital (Urmia, West Azerbaijan Province, Iran), and Imam Reza Hospital (Tabriz, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran).The study population included 200 female breast cancer patients and 200 healthy women (controls).Whole blood samples (2 cc) were collected from each participant via venipuncture and transferred to sample tubes containing EDTA for DNA and leukocyte extraction.

DNA Extraction
A DNA extraction kit (EX0061; SINACLON Co., Iran) based on the phenol-chloroform method was used following the manufacturer's instructions.To ensure DNA quality and quantity, electrophoresis was performed on a 0.7% agarose gel.The A260/A280 ratio, determined using a Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), ranged between 1.8-2.0[36].

Primer design
The CYP1A2 and ADSL gene sequences were obtained in FASTA format from the GENE database using the NCBI search engine.The mutation loci of ADSL (rs3788579) and CYP1A2 (rs17861162) were obtained from the SNP database using the NCBI search engine (Table 1).The online software Primer 3 was used to determine the REVERSE and FORWARD primer sequences (Table 2).

SNP selection and genotyping
The selection of the CYP1A2 and ADSL genes was based on their involvement in metabolic processes.The choice of the ADSL-rs3788579 and CYP1A2-rs17861162 SNPs was made after reviewing available literature from multiple online databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Ensembl BioMart, and dbSNP.SNP IDs and frequencies were obtained from sources such as the International 1000 Genomes Project and ENSEMBL BIOMart.

Restriction fragments length polymorphism (RFLP)
The web-based tool NEBCutter v 3.0.17was used to design RFLP methods.Based on the results, enzymes BSP12861 and SAU3A respectively showed the best cleavage sites at the mononucleotide polymorphism loci of ADSL-rs3788579 and CYP1A2-rs17861162.SNP detection was performed using restriction enzymes according to the manufacturer's instructions.The chemical digestion reaction was carried out by combining 10 µl of the final PCR solution with 1 µl of BSP 12861 or SAU3A enzymes (CinnaGen Co., Iran), 2 µl of buffer, and 17 µl of sterile distilled water, resulting in a total volume of 30 µl.The process was conducted at 37 °C for 19 h, followed by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Statistical analysis
Initially, the study utilized the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) to assess allele frequencies for each SNP within the control group.For statistical analysis, the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were conducted using SPSS 16.0 software.Genotype analysis considered the homozygous state (AA), heterozygote model (Aa), and additive model (AA vs. Aa vs.

Results
The BSP 12861 enzyme can cleave the wild-type CYP1A2 gene at the rs17861162 locus.Since the enzyme cleaves the G/C at this locus, when the dominant allele (C) is mutated to the disease-related allele (G), BSP 12861 can no longer perform this function.Therefore, BSP 12861 results in the production of a single 140-base pair segment in genes without a splicing locus (mutant homozygous-GG), one 91-base pair and one 49-base pair segments in genes with a single splicing locus (wild-type homozygous-CC), and three segments (140, 91, and 49 base pairs) in genes with two splicing loci (Fig. 1).The CC, CG, and GG genotypes were observed in 54%, 37%, and 9% of the breast cancer patients and 69%, 29%, and 2% of the healthy controls, respectively.In this study, we observed a 21.7% decrease in the CC genotype frequency and a 21.6% and 77.8% increase in the frequencies of the CG and GG genotypes, respectively, compared to controls (P-value ≤ 0.05).
The frequency of the C allele was 72.5% and 83.5% in breast cancer patients and controls, respectively.In the same order, the G allele was observed with a frequency of 27.5% and 16.5%.Based on these findings, there may be a possible association between the G allele and an increased risk of developing breast cancer.The risk of breast cancer in patients carrying the G allele was 1.92, which, being greater than one, is associated with an increased risk of developing breast cancer (P-value ≤ 0.05).
In the ADSL-rs3788579 SNP, C and T are the dominant and disease-related alleles, respectively.Since the Sau3a enzyme's splicing locus sequence is GATC/CTAG, the substitution of C with T renders the enzyme ineffective.Hence, enzymatic cleavage results in wild-type homozygous (CC) genes producing three segments (193, 108, and 24 base pairs), and heterozygous (TC) genes produce four segments (193,192, 108, and 24 base pairs).The 24-base pair segment is a non-polymorphic section of the genome.In our study, the prevalence of the TT, CC, and TC genotypes was 24%, 56%, and 20% in breast cancer patients and 52%, 27%, and 21% in the controls (Table 3) (P-value ≤ 0.05).Among the healthy participants, genotypes CC and TC were the most and least frequent, respectively.In contrast, genotypes TT and TC were the most and least frequent genotypes in the breast cancer group.Based on the Chi-square test, the difference in genotype distribution between the two groups was significant.The T allele is the most frequent allele in breast cancer patients; compared to the healthy controls, this allele was 28.5% more frequently observed in the breast cancer group.We suggest a possible link between the higher frequency of the T allele and the development of breast cancer.Since carrying the T allele was associated with a 3.235-fold risk of breast cancer, this risk factor possibly increases the likelihood of breast cancer (P-value ≤ 0.05).In this study, both groups conform to the Hardy-Weinberg principle.
The study investigated the influence of two SNPs in the ADSL and CYP1A2 genes on clinicopathological parameters in patients, including menstrual status and age at diagnosis (Table 4).In the case of CYP1A2 rs17861162, individuals with the CC genotype were more likely to be of older age compared to carriers with the combined genotype (GG + CG),

Discussion
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women, with over 1 million new cases diagnosed annually.
Recent research indicates a growing prevalence of breast cancer among Iranian women, particularly at a younger age, which raises concerns [37,38].Although our knowledge of breast cancer is still evolving, we have identified various genetic risk factors associated with the disease [10].
Our current study's results reveal that CYP1A2 SNPs (rs17861162) in breast cancer patients are associated with a 21.7% decrease in the frequency of the CC genotype and a 21.6% and 77.8% increase in the frequency of CG and GG genotypes, respectively.Furthermore, this SNP leads to an 11% decrease in the frequency of the C allele and an 11% increase in the frequency of the G allele within the breast cancer group compared to healthy controls (P-value = 0.00).Altogether, the CYP1A2 SNP (rs17861162) results in an alteration of the allelic balance observed in women without breast cancer.Notably, there is a limited body of research on the impact of the rs17861162 locus polymorphism on the CYP1A2 gene, and as far as our knowledge extends, no previous study has explored this aspect in Iran.
The known and possible functional roles of this SNP in breast cancer have not yet been revealed precisely, however, CYP1A2 plays a prominent role in the activation of pre-carcinogens through metabolic processes [39] and SNPs can alter the activity of the corresponding proteins [19].Given the prominent role of human Cytochrome P450 enzymes in the metabolism of medications, toxins, and chemical compounds, any alteration to the genomic sequence encoding these enzymes may subsequently elevate the risk of cancer [18,42].It is noteworthy that the link between clinicopathological characteristics and the prognosis of breast cancer with the CYP1A2-rs17861162 SNP was first identified by Bai et al.They reported a significant correlation between the CYP1A2-rs17861162 SNP and factors such as age, menstrual status, and the presence of the P53 marker in women diagnosed with breast cancer.In comparison to individuals with the CC genotype, those carrying this SNP, particularly the combined genotype (GG + CG), were more likely to be younger and pre-menopausal, as well as to test negative for the P53 tumor marker [10].CYP1A2 acts as an agent for metabolizing endogenous compounds such as steroid hormones, retinoic acid, and bile acids [39].Estrogen levels significantly influence breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women, a factor intricately linked to both menstrual status and age [40].However, Bai et al. did not observe any connection between this SNP and the patient's genotype in relation to breast cancer prognosis.Additionally, the interplay between coffee consumption and the CYP1A2*1F genotype has been shown to impact the age at which breast cancer is diagnosed and the status of estrogen receptors [41].Khvostova et al. investigated the polymorphism of estrogen-metabolizing enzymes (cytochromeP450s: CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP19) in breast cancer patients within a cohort of Siberian women.They reported several polymorphisms associated with an increased risk of cancer development and progression.Furthermore, they observed that the CYP1A2 polymorphism increases the risk of developing estrogen receptor-positive tumors [43].Liu et al. observed that SNPs occurring in CYP1A2-rs17861162 and -rs-11636419 influence the efficacy of epidural ropivacaine in women with breast cancer [44].Ghotbi et al. reported differences in CYP1A2 polymorphism frequencies between the Swedish and Korean populations [45], while Lim et al. observed significant inter-ethnic differences among the Chinese, Malay, and Indian populations [22].Perera et al. observed a significant difference in CYP1A2 activity between South Asian and European ethnicities [23] CYP1A2 plays a pivotal role in the metabolism of 10-13% of all carcinogens and medications, including clozapine, olanzapine, theophylline, and heterocyclic aromatic amines [22,23,46].It is also involved in metabolizing substances like coffee and estrogen [47], while inactivating exogenous compounds such as environmental pro-carcinogens [10].CYP1A2 significantly contributes to the 2-hydroxylation of the primary estrone and estradiol [47,48].Notably, through the activation of various carcinogenic heterocyclic amines, CYP1A2 may contribute to the progression of specific malignancies [22].The literature underscores that genetic polymorphisms substantially influence the expression and activity of CYP1A2 [10,24].To date, over 30 SNPs have been identified in the CYP1A2 upstream sequence and its intron-1 region [23], contributing to its role in cancer development and progression [10,49].
The link between CYP1A2 polymorphisms and an increased susceptibility to developing lung, colorectal, breast, and biliary cancers has been established [43,50].In general, the role of CYP1A2 polymorphisms in cancer development remains a subject of debate.While numerous studies have investigated the role of CYP1A2 polymorphisms in breast cancer development among different ethnicities, findings have not consistently aligned [10,47].Some studies report a negative association between CYP1A2*1F and breast cancer incidence [25] or that the presence of the C allele is protective against the disease [25,51].However, others have failed to observe the same trends [25,48] or establish their precise role in disease development [48].Additional investigations have reported associations between CYP1A2 SNPs and breast cancer [10].Increased CYP1A2 gene activity has also been linked to a heightened risk of breast cancer development [52].These discrepancies may arise from various individual, genetic, and ethnic determinants, alongside exposure to environmental risk factors and differences in healthcare approaches or a complex interplay between these factors [22].
Additionally, in our investigation of the ADSL gene's SNP rs3788579, we found a significantly higher prevalence of the T allele in individuals with breast cancer compared to the healthy group, exceeding by 28.5% (P-value = 0.00).This finding suggests a potential association between the increased frequency of the T allele and breast cancer incidence.Furthermore, carriers of the T allele exhibited a 3.235-fold higher risk of developing breast cancer, indicating that the presence of this allele may contribute to an elevated risk of breast cancer incidence.To the best of our knowledge, no previous investigation has been made into the impact of ADSL-rs3788579 SNP on breast cancer development.
The ADSL gene exhibits typical characteristics of a housekeeping gene [53].Functioning as an essential homotetrameric enzyme, ADSL plays a pivotal role in two key reactions: 1) the conversion of succinylaminoimidazolecarboxamide (SAICA)-ribotide (SAICAR) into AICA-ribotide (AICAR) through the de novo purine synthesis pathway, and 2) the generation of AMP by converting adenylo-succinate into adenosine monophosphate as part of the purine nucleotide cycle [54].Potential modifications to the purine nucleotide degradation pathway resulting from non-synonymous SNPs in the ADSL gene could lead to structural or functional alterations in its associated protein [55].Available evidence suggests that point mutations within the ADSL gene can result in significant variations in IMP content [56,57].Chen et al. investigated the relationship between the 7 SNP genotypes and expression levels of the ADSL gene in CEU cell lines, finding significant correlations between ADSL-rs8135371 and -17001863 and the expression of the ADSL gene.Furthermore, the total copies of the C and G alleles were found to increase ADSL expression in rs8135371 and rs17001863 SNPs, respectively [58].
The ADSL gene plays a crucial role in maintaining the ATP/AMP ratio, a fundamental factor in regulating cell division and metabolism [53].It contributes to this equilibrium by providing the necessary purine nucleotides required for DNA

Research
Discover Oncology (2024) 15:59 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-00919-zreplication and cell division.In vertebrates, the purine nucleotide degradation pathway consists of ten enzymatic steps, with ADSL, AMPD1, and ATIC being among the most significant.As ADSL oversees two of these pathway steps, modifications to the enzyme at either of these stages can lead to subsequent alterations in IMP content [53].Increased levels of ADSL have been observed in various conditions, including colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer.Furthermore, genomic variations have been associated with specific traits, such as drug responsiveness, along with changes in gene expression [58].Despite the recognized disruption of ADSL activity in various malignancies, such as breast, colorectal, prostate cancer, tubulovillous and tubular adenoma, glioma, and more, the precise mechanisms governing the impact of ADSL on the initiation and progression of these disorders remain incompletely understood [34,59,60].
Zurlo et al. documented that depletion of ADSL leads to an increase in the expression of the long non-coding RNA MIR2HG by altering adenosine and adenine levels.MIR22HG, in turn, reduces the expression of the oncogene c-YMC at the protein level.Consequently, knocking out ADSL hampers the growth and invasion of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells, both in vitro and in vivo [34].Park et al. proposed that the ADSL gene promotes oncogenesis in endometrial cancer by upregulating the expression of killer cell lectin-like receptor C3 (KLRC3) through fumarate production.Their findings indicated that ADSL enhances tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and migration by modulating KLRC3 expression.The application of external fumarate restored KLRC3 expression in ADSL knockout cells, indicating that ADSL regulates KLRC3 expression through fumarate production [59].Evidence confirms that in human endometrioid carcinoma, ADSL expression was correlated with increased histological aggressiveness and the extent of primary tumor progression.
Breast cancer arises from the accumulation of genetic defects in epithelial cells, resulting in the presentation of malignant phenotypes [61].Although novel therapeutic options have significantly improved breast cancer treatment, the inherent histological, molecular, and genomic heterogeneity of this malignancy complicates gene-based interventions [62].Due to the limitations and disadvantages of conventional diagnostic modalities such as X-rays, Ultrasound, and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, less invasive and cost-effective alternatives are gaining popularity.In this context, screening for genetic markers, such as CYP1A2 and ADSL, is considered a potential alternative to conventional methods.Numerous genomic variants, also known as SNPs, including CYP1A2 (rs17861162) and ADSL (rs3788579), appear to be correlated with the risk of breast cancer development.Investigating these SNPs may contribute to improving diagnostic accuracy due to their significant interpersonal and genetic variations [63,64].Besides their diagnostic potential, these markers may be useful in the early detection of breast cancer and risk assessment for individuals with this malignancy.

Conclusion
In conclusion, our findings demonstrate a notable shift in allele frequencies within the CYP1A2-rs17861162 SNP, from the prevalent C allele to the disease-associated G allele, resulting in an 11% increase, as well as a substantial 28.5% increase in the T allele of the ADSL-rs3788579 SNP among female breast cancer patients in North-West Iran when compared to healthy controls.These significant genetic alterations strongly suggest their potential association with the development and progression of breast cancer within this specific population.This underscores the promising utility of CYP1A2-rs17861162 and ADSL-rs378879 SNP detection as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Electrophoresis of products obtained from the enzymatic digestion of the BSP 12861 enzyme

Table 1
Polymorphisms present in human CYP1A2 & ADSL

Table 2
Forward and Reverse primers of CYP1A2 and ADSL genes

Table 3
Association of CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 genetic polymorphisms